Skip to main content

China's Regime Deserves to Be Shunned for Bullying Taiwan


“The use of force is an option that mainland China has always maintained (ä½æē”Øę­¦åŠ›ę˜Æäø­å›½å¤§é™†å§‹ē»ˆäæęŒēš„äø€äøŖ选锹),” wrote in a recent op-ed Hu Xijin (čƒ”é””čæ›) about Beijing's plans to annex Taiwan.

Hu Xijin is the former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, a nationalistic tabloid owned by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

 
"Taipei Skyline 2022.06.29" by ęÆ›č²“å¤§å°‘ēˆŗ is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.



Hu wrote that the use of force is “the fundamental pillar for the advancement of the peaceful reunification route,” calling it “the sword of Damocles hanging over the heads of the ‘Taiwan independence’ forces” (ä½æē”Øę­¦åŠ›ę˜Æäø­å›½å¤§é™†å§‹ē»ˆäæęŒēš„äø€äøŖ选锹,它也ę˜Æ和平ē»Ÿäø€č·Æēŗæ得仄ęŽØčæ›ēš„ę ¹ęœ¬ę”Æ꒑,ę˜ÆꂬåœØ“台ē‹¬”åŠæ力夓锶ēš„č¾¾ę‘©å…‹åˆ©ę–Æ之剑).


“Let us support the People's Liberation Army,” he continued, “and various preparations for the military struggle in the Taiwan Strait, while maintaining a stable and calm collective attitude and continuously enhancing cohesion around major national decisions. Taiwan cannot escape, and reunification will eventually be achieved. The Sword of Damocles, the sword of force, not only hangs there, but is definitely not just for show” (ęˆ‘ä»¬ę”ÆęŒč§£ę”¾å†›å’Œé’ˆåÆ¹å°ęµ·å†›äŗ‹ę–—äŗ‰ēš„各ē§å‡†å¤‡,åŒę—¶äæęŒēس偄、从容ēš„é›†ä½“ę€åŗ¦,äøę–­å¢žå¼ŗ囓ē»•å›½å®¶é‡å¤§å†³ē­–ēš„å‡čšåŠ›。å°ę¹¾č·‘äøäŗ†,ē»Ÿäø€ē»ˆå°†å®žēŽ°,ę­¦åŠ›čæ™ęŠŠč¾¾ę‘©å…‹åˆ©ę–Æ之剑äøä»…é«˜ę‚¬åœØ那里,而äø”ē»éžę‘†č®¾).


The People's Republic of China (PRC) claims Taiwan as part of its territory, a doctrine it calls the “One-China principle”, which states that: “There is but one China in the world, Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory, and the Government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China.”

Hu Xijin is considered the founder of “commercial nationalism” in the PRC, a tabloid style that is both in line with the regime's ideology, and profitable. Hu claims that he participated in the 1989 pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square, but later became a staunch supporter of the CCP.

The “Sword of Damocles” Hu is talking about is just another word for blackmail. The PRC has engaged for decades in blackmail, in threats and harassment, in order to bring under its control 23 million Taiwanese people who have never been ruled by the CCP’s authoritarian regime, and do not want to be ruled by it.

According to a poll released in November 2023, 44.3 percent of Taiwanese supported “forever maintaining the status quo,” and 35.8 percent of respondents supported “maintaining the status quo while working toward independence.”

Only 0.7 percent of respondents supported “unification as soon as possible”, and 11.5 percent supported “maintaining the status quo while working toward unification”.

The “status quo” means that Taiwan is de facto an independent sovereign state. Holding an independence referendum would be just a formality.

The international community pretends that the PRC is just a state like any other. On January 16, for instance, PRC Premier Li Qiang (Ꝏå¼ŗ) was given a platform at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos. He gave a keynote speech, saying that the PRC economy was open for business. He highlighted the country's potential for foreign investment, and stressed that the world needs to pull down barriers to competition and trade to tackle global challenges. Quite ironic, considering the PRC's notorious unfair trade practices.

In the US, some business tycoons and left-wing figures alike are willing to support Beijing, to become apologists and sycophants for the regime.

The PRC’s behaviour should not be normalised. Its leadership pursues a policy of hegemony couched in anti-US, anti-imperialist rhetoric. It is not a coincidence that Beijing has territorial disputes with nearly all of its neighbours.

The PRC claims virtually the entire South China Sea, where it has built artificial islands and military bases, and faces opposition from the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei. The green lines on the map below show the extent of Beijing's maritime claims:

The PRC's maritime claims (the so-called "9 dash line"). Public domain via Wikimedia Commons 



When the PRC released a new official map in 2023, several countries protested. For example, Malaysia's Foreign Ministry stated: "Malaysia does not recognize China's 2023 standard map, which outlines portions of Malaysian waters near Sabah and Sarawak as belonging to China. Malaysia is not bound to China's 2023 standard map in any way.”

The PRC also has disputes with Japan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Laos, South Korea, and Russia.

In 2023, the PRC and the Philippines engaged in a series of tense incidents over disputed islands, reefs, and shoals.

The conflict escalated when the PRC intensified its pressure on the Philippines' presence in the Second Thomas Shoal, a submerged reef where a small contingent of Philippine marines has been stationed since 1999 on a rusting World War II-era ship.

Beijing has repeatedly tried to block and harass the Philippine resupply vessels, using its coast guard and maritime militia forces to assert its control over the area. In December 2023, a PRC coast guard ship sprayed water cannons at a Philippine boat, causing damage and injuries to the crew. A few days later, a PRC and a Philippine vessel collided near the shoal, sparking a diplomatic protest from Manila.

The Second Thomas Shoal is not the only hotspot in the South China Sea. In March, the Philippines detected hundreds of PRC fishing boats, believed to be part of the maritime militia, near the Julian Felipe Reef (also known as Whitsun Reef), a coral reef within the Philippines' Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

The Philippines accused the PRC of violating its sovereignty and demanded the withdrawal of the boats, but Beijing refused, claiming that the reef is part of its territory and that the boats were merely sheltering from bad weather. The standoff lasted for weeks, drawing international condemnation and support for the Philippines from the United States, Japan, Australia, and other countries.

These examples show that the CCP regime is not a constructive and peaceful member of the international community. Would a government interested in cooperation and stability have territorial and trade disputes with so many countries?

The case of Taiwan is particularly egregious. Here is a people that has overcome decades of dictatorial rule, built a successful democracy, and plays a positive role in the international community. But the one-party dictatorship in Beijing cannot let them be. It has to threaten them with annexation on the basis of its ultranationalist, imperialist ideology.

We have seen what happens when the CCP takes over a new territory. In 1997, the United Kingdom handed over Hong Kong to the PRC. In June 2020, Beijing imposed on Hong Kong the National Security Law, destroying the city's civil rights and liberties.

There is no doubt that the PRC would do to Taiwan what it did to Hong Kong, forcing its authoritarian conformity on the people, empowering its puppets and silencing its opponents.

The international community should not normalise such behaviour. There really is no grey area or no complexity to this situation. Taiwan has never been part of the PRC. It is a democracy. The vast majority of its people don't want to be subjects of some CCP overlords in Beijing. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Window Trick of Las Vegas Hotels

When I lived in Hong Kong I often passed by a residential apartment complex commonly known as the " monster building ".  " Interior of the Yick Cheong Building November 2016 " by  Nick-D  is licensed under  CC BY-SA 4.0 . _____

Living in Taiwan: Seven Reasons Why It's Good to Be Here

Chinese New Year can be a pretty boring time for a foreigner. All of my friends were celebrating with their families, and since I have no family here, nor have I a girlfriend whose family I could join, I had nothing special to do. Shops and cafes were closed - apart from big chains like McDonald's or Starbucks, which were overcrowded anyway. So I had a lot of time to think. On Saturday evening I went out to buy my dinner. While I was walking around, I heard the voices of the people inside their homes, the sounds of their New Year celebrations. Then I suddenly asked myself: "What on earth are you doing here? Why are you still in Taiwan?"  Before I came to Taiwan, some Taiwanese friends of mine had recommended me their country, highly prasing it and going so far as to say that Taiwan is a "paradise for foreigners" (bear in mind that when I say foreigners I mean 'Westerners').  "It's easy for foreigners to find a job," t

Is China's MINISO Copying Japan's MUJI, UNIQLO and Daiso?

Over the past few years Japanese retailers such as UNIQLO and MUJI have conquered foreign markets, opening shops in cities such as Paris, Berlin or New York and becoming household names in several countries. But the success of their business model seems to have inspired people with dubious intentions. As the website Daliulian recently showed, a new chain called MINISO, which claims to be a Japanese company selling ‘100% Japanese products’, seems to be nothing more than a knock-off of UNIQLO, MUJI and Daiso, copying their logos, names and even the layout of their stores. The company’s webpage proudly announces – in terrible English – that “ MINISO is a fast fashion designer brand of Japan. Headquartered in Tokyo Japan, Japanese young designer Miyake Jyunya is founder as well as the chief designer of MINISO, a pioneer in global 'Fashion & Casual Superior Products' field. ” According to the company’s homepage, MINISO advocates the philosophy of a simple,

Macau: Gambling, Corruption, Prostitution, and Fake Worlds

As I mentioned in my previous post , Macau has different faces and identities: there is the old Macau, full of colonial buildings and in which the pace of life seems to resemble a relaxed Mediterranean town rather than a bustling, hectic Chinese city, such as Hong Kong or Shanghai. On the other hand, there is the Macau of gambling, of gigantic hotel and casino resorts, and of prostitution. These two Macaus seem to be spatially separated from each other, with an intact colonial city centre and nice outskirts with small alleys on the one side, and bombastic, modern buildings on the other.  The Galaxy - one of the huge casino and hotel resorts The Importance of Gambling for Macau's Economy Dubbed the 'Monte Carlo of the East', Macau has often been portrayed as the gambling capital of China. Media reporting on Macau tend present pictures of the city's glistening, apparently luxurious skyline. But a visit in Macau suffices to realize that it is fa

Trip to Tainan

Tainan Train Station Last weekend I made a one day trip to the Southern Taiwanese city of Tainan (Chinese: č‡ŗ南, pinyin: TĆ”inĆ”n), the former capital and one of the most important centres of culture, history and architecture of the island. This blog post is also intended as a special thank to Grace, a Taiwanese friend who was so kind to show me around, and very patient, too. Since Tainan doesn't have an extensive public transport net, Grace picked me up at the train station with her motorcycle, a vehicle that, along with cars, is regarded by locals as indispensable for living comfortably in Tainan. To my great embarrassment, though, I had to admit that I cannot ride a motorcycle. That's why we had to take busses to move around. It was the first time she ever took a bus in Tainan. And now I know why: busses come more or less every half an hour, and service stops early in the evening. No wonder Tainanese snob public transport. Grace had no idea about the routes and about whe